Thread: Short Response by Text message
Results 1 to 10 of 12
10-23-2009, 12:12 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
Hey guys so Im having some trouble hopefully someones got some insight on what to do here the situation:
Short Response by Text message
After writing an exam i was about to leave but i walked by the university lounge and there was an environmental awareness play going on. i noticed this really cute portuguese girl in the play. i watched the end of the play and approached the group that the girl was in and begun asking questions about the group and showing some interest being very sociable and friendly getting to know everyone from the play. In doing so i met the girl and turns up the group was going to a cafe and i got invited to join them so the rest of the night went amazingly i was very social and used a lot of storytelling techniques to set a high status in the group and adressed a jealous guy friend of hers (big deal for me since its first time adressing c-block.)everything was going well and at the end of the night i asked and got her number, she told me to message her to let her know who it was. then i stayed for a bit then left with a few others who were leaving also.
today i text message her using call back humor of her part in the play
(hey mother nature :P Its Andrew, funniest thing happened today i met someone who looked just like you!)
but heres where the problem is i keep getting short responses from her (ie. "thats weird" -in response to my "i met a girl that looks like you" statement)
basicaly i find myself leading the conversation completely, not reciprocated which is completely different from last night. So I was wondering if anyone had any ideas on how to approach this or what to try next.
Ive considered just waiting a couple of days then ask her out on the phone and taking her for dessert and salsa dancing(she expressed interest in salsa dancing) or to this halloween event with haunted houses and corn mazes.
10-23-2009, 05:03 PM #2
Don't forget to play the numbers game... don't chase too hard or you will come off like a stalker.
The text was probably slightly off the mark:
"(hey mother nature :P Its Andrew, funniest thing happened today i met someone who looked just like you!)"
I like where you're going, but why would she find that funny? She would probably find it 'weird', like she said, espec. since you've only had brief contact.
You need to lower her and also not come off too pushy, could have gone for something like
"Don't know if you know this, but you've got a freaking look-a-like on campus. Really weird. I went to say hi and then realised it wasn't you... but it was too late!"
I dunno, my text game ain't that hot!
10-23-2009, 08:06 PM #3IDSC Guest
I'd switch it up,
" Hey, (start w/ call back humor), Why didn't i know that you had a sister? and why is she so much nicer than you?"
the second question is a) playful teasing b) giving her a chance to qualify
10-23-2009, 08:47 PM #4
punish her until she stops being retarded, or starts qualifying, also do feeze outs etc.
if she does it again:
"you're cool" (sarcasm)
"what the hell?" (has to be used carefully, she has to say something dumb)
etc picking whichever one fits. notice these are short responses too.
If she does stop being retarded she will start qualifying to explain herself to you which will make her feel like she is reciprocating your attention even though she may not intend to for whatever trivial or serious reason. Once she does this keep it fun.
You then become the one sending the short responses and her trying to game you. This dynamic will hold you through to a day 2.
If she hates you she will not qualify and then it was already lost.
10-23-2009, 08:58 PM #5IDSC Guest
Lv3 - "punish her until she stops being retarded"
It seems like some guys in this community don't even like girls. Go masturbate if you think they are so annoying to be around.
Just from a principle based vantage that statement reeks of bad advice. (I just read the rest of your post and guess what ... pretty damn bad). The fact that you think of girls as being retarded for not responding to you is a clear sign of insecurities. Deal with your inner game issues on your own, not on someone else's thread.
Last edited by IDSC; 10-23-2009 at 08:59 PM. Reason: pronoun change
10-24-2009, 05:27 AM #6
What the hell is with telling me I have clear signs of insecurity or how to go about posting in your model of the world? Do not respond to me with that audacious angle like that again.
This is straight stuff from Braddock's crowning peice of advice that he did his main superconference segment on, it's the real deal and good conceptually. Savoy made a point to praise this as important. Daxx has been going around saying Braddock's new stuff literally doubled his game and can't thank him enough, and Daxx is GOOD and has been an upper level respected senior instructor. He mentioned that before he started incorporating the concept into his game he couldn't lay 3 girls in 4 nights and as soon as he did, he managed to pull it off within weeks. This has been backed up as game changer by multiple top instructors (like Sinn) who praised it as "epic" etc, and Daxx has pretty much been in shock and awe for a month due to what has been done to his senior LS instructor level game.
So from a principle standpoint this is off the chain, not bad.
From an inner game standpoint there's some crossover between another inner game theory, one which this week was a major favorite for:
10-24-2009, 07:23 AM #7IDSC Guest
Looks like I hit a nerve!!!
I'm glad that it makes you feel better to tell me that you think you're right and I'm wrong.
10-24-2009, 08:23 AM #8
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
All right boys remember we are all on the same side lets be professional about this lol and thanks for the advice im going to try and incorporate a little of both into my next encounter with her. Im thinking qualification and then i need to work in some kino techniques
10-24-2009, 09:06 AM #9
Originally Posted by Lv3
- Join Date
- May 2007
not meaning to be offensive, just letting you know because you seem to be oblivious to it - the same way i'd tell someone if they had food on their face but didn't know
Originally Posted by Lv3
note how he lists a rap sheet of other people's experiences instead of sharing a single one of his own... based on the misogny of his suggestions i'm guessing there aren't many to draw from
i seriously think you need to take a break from the community man... like no forums, no reading, no theory no nothing community related for like a straight up month... clear your head a bit
again not meaning to be offensive, but god damn, those were some messed up posts bro and i genuinely think you need help
Originally Posted by armin999
10-24-2009, 09:09 AM #10
When you're punishing a girl like this you're "disqualifying" what she says. You're disengaging from the conversation.
If she is afraid of losing you she will "qualify"
The point of this is to successfully manipulate her into what instructors call "not sabotaging her own seduction".
"qualification" is a process when you reward her "qualifying" with a massive indicator of interest. Ex:
You: "so are you a polite person?"
You: "Good, I'm attracted to polite girls"
By NCNick in forum Field ReportsReplies: 20Last Post: 04-27-2012, 11:38 AM
By AlterImago in forum Tinder, Online Dating and Instant Messaging ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 10-23-2009, 07:45 PM
By kinoci in forum Tinder, Online Dating and Instant Messaging ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 09-13-2009, 07:05 AM
By davidp604 in forum The 18-21 ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 02-21-2008, 06:43 PM
By GoodFellaFlyGuy in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 02-09-2008, 04:34 PM